Conlin v. F. W. Kraft & Sons Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Conlin v. F. W. Kraft & Sons Co.

3 N.E.2d 611, 271 N.Y. 499, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1227

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 8, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 N.E.2d 611 (Conlin v. F. W. Kraft & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conlin v. F. W. Kraft & Sons Co., 3 N.E.2d 611, 271 N.Y. 499, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1227 (N.Y. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Special Term found that the defendant corporation, F. W. Kraft & Sons Company, having theretofore refused to pay its obhgation to the plaintiff when due, in effect transferred its property to its stockholders for less than the full value of the property; and that such transfer was made and intended to prevent the plaintiff from enforcing his right as a creditor against the *504 property so transferred. These findings, we think, are in accord with the weight of the evidence.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division.

Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI