Conliff v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conliff v. City of New York

91 A.D.2d 531, 458 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19353

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1982·Published

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gorman, J.), entered on November 18,1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent [532]*532of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Patricia Conliff and a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Patricia Conliff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in her favor to $100,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Patricia Conliff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Silverman, Fein and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gorman, J.), entered on November 18,1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent [532]*532of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Patricia Conliff and a new trial ordered only on the issue of damages awarded to said plaintiff, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, unless plaintiff Patricia Conliff, within 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in her favor to $100,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Patricia Conliff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross, Silverman, Fein and Kassal, JJ.

Conliff v. City of New York, 91 A.D.2d 531, 458 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19353 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

91 A.D.2d 531 (Conliff v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.