Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Conley v. WYNDHAM

Conley v. WYNDHAM

917 So. 2d 344, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 100
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2005·No. 1D05-1186·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

917 So.2d 344 (2005)

Barbara CONLEY, Appellant,
v.
Maureen M. WYNDHAM, Appellee.

No. 1D05-1186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

December 28, 2005.

Jeffrey J. Sneed of Eakin, Sneed & Catalan, Atlantic Beach, for Appellant.

Kevin E. Jakab and John Moffitt Howell of Howell & O'Neal, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

*345 PER CURIAM.

We treat Barbara Conley's notice of appeal from a non-final pretrial order imposing a monetary sanction as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Avril v. Civilmar, 605 So.2d 988 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). We deny the petition because Conley has failed to demonstrate a clear departure from the essential requirements of law resulting in irreparable injury. Malone v. Costin, 410 So.2d 569, 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). See also Rydell v. Rutter, 834 So.2d 883, 885 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

Petition denied.

WEBSTER, VAN NORTWICK and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley v. WYNDHAM, 917 So. 2d 344, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 100 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

917 So. 2d 344 (Conley v. WYNDHAM) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bodie v. State
917 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)