Conley v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conley v. State

123 A.D.2d 598, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60745

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 A.D.2d 598 (Conley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conley v. State, 123 A.D.2d 598, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a claim to recover damages for medical malpractice, the State of New York appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Benza, J.), dated May 3, 1985, which granted the claimant’s motion to have its notice of intention to file a claim against the State deemed a notice of claim.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The claimant’s notice of intention to file a claim was timely served and contains sufficient information to satisfy the requirements of Court of Claims Act § 11 as to a notice of claim, so as to apprise the State of New York of what tortious acts are being complained about and when and where they are alleged to have taken place, together with the alleged injury. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a claim to recover damages for medical malpractice, the State of New York appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Benza, J.), dated May 3, 1985, which granted the claimant’s motion to have its notice of intention to file a claim against the State deemed a notice of claim.

Order affirmed, with costs.

The claimant’s notice of intention to file a claim was timely served and contains sufficient information to satisfy the requirements of Court of Claims Act § 11 as to a notice of claim, so as to apprise the State of New York of what tortious acts are being complained about and when and where they are alleged to have taken place, together with the alleged injury. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 598, 506 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conley-v-state-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack