Conley v. State

777 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 237, 2001 WL 38681
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 17, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony L. Conley appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), which alleged that he is entitled to relief under the supreme court’s decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm without prejudice to Conley filing a timely and facially sufficient rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntary and intelligent nature of his plea pursuant to Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (affirming without prejudice to filing a rule 3.850 motion challenging the voluntariness of the plea based upon a plea agreement wherein petitioner received the bottom of the 1995 guidelines) (en banc).

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY, (Sr.) J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley v. State, 777 So. 2d 1086, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 237, 2001 WL 38681 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

777 So. 2d 1086 (Conley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)