Conley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conley v. State

221 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5882

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 9, 1969

DocketNo. 68-389

StatusPublished

This text of 221 So. 2d 9 (Conley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conley v. State, 221 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5882 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.

This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.

This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conley-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack