Conley v. State

221 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5882
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 9, 1969·No. No. 68-389·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Morgan v. State (Fla.App.2d 1962), 142 So.2d 308 and Rohdin v. State (Fla.App.2d 1958), 105 So.2d 371.

This case is clearly distinguishable from Specht v. Patterson (1967), 386 U.S. 605, 87 S.Ct. 1209, 18 L.Ed.2d 326, and Townsend v. Burke (1948), 334 U.S. 736, 68 S.Ct. 1252, 92 L.Ed. 1690; and our decision is wholly consonant with Williams v. New York (1949), 337 U.S. 241, 69 S.Ct. 1079, 93 L.Ed. 1337.

LILES, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley v. State, 221 So. 2d 9, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5882 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

221 So. 2d 9 (Conley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Townsend v. Burke
334 U.S. 736 (Supreme Court, 1948)
Williams v. New York
337 U.S. 241 (Supreme Court, 1949)
Specht v. Patterson
386 U.S. 605 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Morgan v. State
142 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)