Conley v. Smith

884 N.E.2d 1107, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1474
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 23, 2008
Docket2006-0919
StatusPublished

This text of 884 N.E.2d 1107 (Conley v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conley v. Smith, 884 N.E.2d 1107, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1474 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2005CA00215, 2006-0hio-1498. On motion to have Clayton B. Smith declared a vexatious litigator and motion to strike that motion. Motions denied.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion to declare Clayton B. Smith a vexatious litigator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 N.E.2d 1107, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conley-v-smith-ohio-2008.