Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.

936 N.E.2d 960, 127 Ohio St. 3d 122
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 2, 2010
DocketNo. 2010-1192
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 936 N.E.2d 960 (Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, Inc., 936 N.E.2d 960, 127 Ohio St. 3d 122 (Ohio 2010).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Pettiford v. Aggarwal, 126 Ohio St.3d 413, 2010-Ohio-3237, 934 N.E.2d 913, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with Pettiford v. Aggarwal.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would not accept the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc.
2011 Ohio 4452 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Conley v. Faurecia Exhaust Sys., Inc.
2010 Ohio 5272 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
936 N.E.2d 960, 127 Ohio St. 3d 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conley-v-faurecia-exhaust-systems-inc-ohio-2010.