Conley v. Davidson
283 P. 52, 34 N.M. 421
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellee moves dismissal of this, appeal on the sole ground that the five days’ notice required by App. Proc. Rule V, § 1, was riot given. ■ He showed no prejudice, and the notice omitted is not jurisdictional. We have therefore overruled the motion, under App. Proc. Rule XIV, § 3.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conley v. Davidson, 283 P. 52, 34 N.M. 421 (N.M. 1929).
283 P. 52 (Conley v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tindall v. Bryan
215 P.2d 354 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1949)
Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. Bank
84 P.2d 649 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1938)
Crabtree v. Board of Com'rs of Socorro County
18 P.2d 657 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1933)
Wilson v. Ruth
290 P. 742 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1930)
Robinson v. T. D. Neal Mercantile Co.
283 P. 52 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1929)