Conley v. Board of Supervisors

50 N.W. 140, 88 Mich. 245
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 11, 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per, Curiam.

The tax cannot be levied in this case until all the records required by the statute (3 How. Stat.. § 1740a9) are deposited and filed in the office of the county clerk.

The drain is entirely within the limits of the township of Casco, but the county drain commissioner has concurrent jurisdiction with the township drain commissioner in such cases. The records, however, if he acts, must be filed in the county clerk’s office, and not with the township clerk.

3 How. Stat. § 17405, provides that—

“No tax for the construction of a drain shall be spread upon the tax roll until all the records thereof, required to be made by such commissioner, are filed with the clerk.”

[247]*247This statute evidently refers to all drains, by whomsoever laid.

As it is admitted by the petition that the statute has not been complied with in this respect, the -application, for an order to show cause will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conley v. Board of Supervisors, 50 N.W. 140, 88 Mich. 245 (Mich. 1891).

50 N.W. 140 (Conley v. Board of Supervisors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ranney Refrigerator Co. v. Smith
122 N.W. 91 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1909)