Conley & Johnson v. Palmer
3 How. Pr. 78
This text of 3 How. Pr. 78 (Conley & Johnson v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conley & Johnson v. Palmer, 3 How. Pr. 78 (N.Y. 1847).
Opinion
Granted the motion with costs, on the ground that the notice of bail was defective in not stating the additions of the sureties, which was fatal. (5 Hill, 519.) Besides, it did not appear that the writ had been returned, and assignment of errors filed according to the rules.
There was no decision announced upon the other points.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 How. Pr. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conley-johnson-v-palmer-ny-1847.