Conlew v. Finch

108 So. 2d 778
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1959·No. No. 58-368·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Strong v. Clay, Fla.1951, 54 So.2d 193; Muller v. Maxcy, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 879; Barton v. Horwick, Fla.1955, 78 So.2d 569; City of Miami v. Miami Transit Company, Fla.App.1957, 96 So.2d 799.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conlew v. Finch, 108 So. 2d 778 (Fla. Ct. App. 1959).

108 So. 2d 778 (Conlew v. Finch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Miami v. Miami Transit Company
96 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Muller v. Maxcy
74 So. 2d 879 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Strong v. Clay
54 So. 2d 193 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Barton v. Horwick
78 So. 2d 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)