Conkling v. Conkling
175 A. 132, 117 N.J. Eq. 218, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 806
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed by Advisory Master Child, in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchakd, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Yan Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conkling v. Conkling, 175 A. 132, 117 N.J. Eq. 218, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 806 (N.J. 1934).
175 A. 132 (Conkling v. Conkling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Simmons v. Simmons
114 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Dacunzo v. Edgye
111 A.2d 88 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Dunn v. O'Day
16 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau, 1940)