Conklin v. Town of Ramapo
719 N.E.2d 919, 93 N.Y.2d 1038, 697 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2949
This text of 719 N.E.2d 919 (Conklin v. Town of Ramapo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Conklin v. Town of Ramapo, 719 N.E.2d 919, 93 N.Y.2d 1038, 697 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2949 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely. The prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d edj).
Judge Ciparick taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
719 N.E.2d 919, 93 N.Y.2d 1038, 697 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-town-of-ramapo-ny-1999.