Conklin v. Reolds Farms Co.

102 So. 12, 88 Fla. 299
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 28, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the order herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respectitve parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said order ; it is, therefore, considered, order and adjudged by the Court that the said order of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla., 279, 97 South. Rep. 714.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conklin v. Reolds Farms Co., 102 So. 12, 88 Fla. 299 (Fla. 1924).

102 So. 12 (Conklin v. Reolds Farms Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taylor v. Rawlins
97 So. 714 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)