Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

278 A.D. 588, 102 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4039

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1951

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 588 (Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission, 278 A.D. 588, 102 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellants sued as trustees of the Johnsontown Methodist Episcopal Church, an unincorporated religious association, to recover certain furnishings and personal property which they claimed were wrongfully withheld from them, as such trustees, by respondents Palisades Interstate Park Commission and Prank Cantido. Respondent Palisades Interstate Park Commission obtained an order permitting it to interplead the respondents who are the trustees of the Newark Annual Conference of the Methodist Church. On motion of the respondent trustees, appellants’ complaint was dismissed, by order of the County Court of Rockland County dated January 30, 1950, on the ground that the plaintiffs had no legal capacity to sue; and on March 13, 1950, plaintiffs’ motion, denominated as one for reargument, was denied, by order of the County Court of Rockland County, bearing that date. Plaintiffs appeal from both orders. The motion denominated as one for reargument, was, in fact, an application for leave to renew on additional papers, and will be so considered on this appeal. (Cf. Matter of Sand, 273 App. Div. 859.) Orders reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondent trustees’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that plaintiffs do not have legal capacity to sue, denied, with $10 costs, with leave to respondents trustees to answer within ten days, and to allege in their answer, as a defense, if so advised, the facts alleged in support of their motion to dismiss the complaint. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 108.) In our opinion, questions of fact were presented by the affidavits submitted, which should not have been summarily decided. Rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice was not intended to deprive parties of their right to trial of disputed questions of fact. (Giannavola v. General By. Signal Co., 244 App. Div. 65.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellants sued as trustees of the Johnsontown Methodist Episcopal Church, an unincorporated religious association, to recover certain furnishings and personal property which they claimed were wrongfully withheld from them, as such trustees, by respondents Palisades Interstate Park Commission and Prank Cantido. Respondent Palisades Interstate Park Commission obtained an order permitting it to interplead the respondents who are the trustees of the Newark Annual Conference of the Methodist Church. On motion of the respondent trustees, appellants’ complaint was dismissed, by order of the County Court of Rockland County dated January 30, 1950, on the ground that the plaintiffs had no legal capacity to sue; and on March 13, 1950, plaintiffs’ motion, denominated as one for reargument, was denied, by order of the County Court of Rockland County, bearing that date. Plaintiffs appeal from both orders. The motion denominated as one for reargument, was, in fact, an application for leave to renew on additional papers, and will be so considered on this appeal. (Cf. Matter of Sand, 273 App. Div. 859.) Orders reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and respondent trustees’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that plaintiffs do not have legal capacity to sue, denied, with $10 costs, with leave to respondents trustees to answer within ten days, and to allege in their answer, as a defense, if so advised, the facts alleged in support of their motion to dismiss the complaint. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 108.) In our opinion, questions of fact were presented by the affidavits submitted, which should not have been summarily decided. Rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice was not intended to deprive parties of their right to trial of disputed questions of fact. (Giannavola v. General By. Signal Co., 244 App. Div. 65.) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D. 588, 102 N.Y.S.2d 283, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-palisades-interstate-park-commission-nyappdiv-1951.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack