Conklin v. . New York Central Railroad Company
144 N.E. 895, 238 N.Y. 570, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 743
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane, Andrews and Lehman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conklin v. . New York Central Railroad Company, 144 N.E. 895, 238 N.Y. 570, 1924 N.Y. LEXIS 743 (N.Y. 1924).
144 N.E. 895 (Conklin v. . New York Central Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bezue v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
176 N.E. 828 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Morini v. Erie Railroad
227 A.D. 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)