Conklin v. Conklin

254 U.S. 608, 65 L. Ed. 435, 41 S. Ct. 12, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1123
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 18, 1920
DocketNo. 192
StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 608 (Conklin v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conklin v. Conklin, 254 U.S. 608, 65 L. Ed. 435, 41 S. Ct. 12, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1123 (1920).

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. William M. Howard, with whom Mr. Jos. B. Gumming, Mr. J. C. C. Black, Mr. William H. Barrett, Mr. Bryan Cumming, Mr. C. Henry Cohen and Mr. W. G. Brantley were on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Goodrich v. Ferris
214 U.S. 71 (Supreme Court, 1909)
United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Product Co.
238 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Sugarman v. United States
249 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 U.S. 608, 65 L. Ed. 435, 41 S. Ct. 12, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-conklin-scotus-1920.