Conklin v. Conklin
This text of 254 U.S. 608 (Conklin v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. William M. Howard, with whom Mr. Jos. B. Gumming, Mr. J. C. C. Black, Mr. William H. Barrett, Mr. Bryan Cumming, Mr. C. Henry Cohen and Mr. W. G. Brantley were on the brief, for appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
254 U.S. 608, 65 L. Ed. 435, 41 S. Ct. 12, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-conklin-scotus-1920.