Conklin v. Conklin

53 A.D.2d 788, 384 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13578
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 17, 1976·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Rensselaer County, entered March 26, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s application seeking to obtain custody of the children of the marriage of the parties and directed her to turn over the possession, custody and control of the children to respondent. The Family Court refused^ to change the custody of the infants here involved previously awarded to respondent by the courts of Pennsylvania. While the best interests of the children is the ultimate controlling consideration, the Pennsylvania decree should be recognized unless there has been an extraordinary change in circumstances (Matter of Metz v Morley, 29 AD2d 462). Moreover, once custody is awarded it should not be shifted merely because the noncustodial parent has experienced an improvement in conditions, circumstances, status or character, unless the custodial parent is shown to be unfit (see Schuler v Schuler, 29 AD2d 669; Matter of Wasserman, 203 NYS2d 554). We find no basis on the instant record to disturb the Family Court’s determination and, accordingly, its order should be upheld. Order affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Larkin, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conklin v. Conklin, 53 A.D.2d 788, 384 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13578 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

53 A.D.2d 788 (Conklin v. Conklin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Susanne U. NN v. Rudolf OO
57 A.D.2d 653 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)