Conklin v. Conklin

286 So. 2d 236, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1973
DocketNo. 73-336
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 286 So. 2d 236 (Conklin v. Conklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conklin v. Conklin, 286 So. 2d 236, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a post-decretal order modifying a so-called property settlement agreement, which provided for alimony of $500.00 per month to be paid to the appellant. The said agreement was incorporated into the final decree of divorce some two and one-half years prior to modification.

Following the receipt of evidence at the hearing on modification, the trial court reduced the amount of alimony to $250.00 monthly. The evidence adduced reveals that appellee’s financial circumstances have been enhanced somewhat, his monthly income increasing some twenty-five per cent, resulting in a somewhat higher standard of living than he enjoyed at the time of the divorce. Correspondingly, the appellant, being released from the bonds of matrimony, has gone to work and was earning some $425.00 per month at the time of the order being reviewed. She is a licensed aviation ground instructor and a licensed real estate sales person in Texas.

[237]*237The evidence presented authorized a conclusion that appellant’s demonstrated ability to earn a living or, at least, to contribute to the earning of a livelihood reduces the necessity to fully rely on appel-lee’s continued contributions under the earlier agreement. Thus, the trial court’s order of reduction seems to be consistent with the discretion accorded a trial judge in the premises. See Martin v. Martin, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 179; Beard v. Beard, Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 269.

There being no error demonstrated by the entry of the order reviewed herein, the same is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldman v. Feldman
317 So. 2d 136 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 So. 2d 236, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-conklin-fladistctapp-1973.