Conklin v. Cody

171 A.D. 922, 155 N.Y.S. 1099

This text of 171 A.D. 922 (Conklin v. Cody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conklin v. Cody, 171 A.D. 922, 155 N.Y.S. 1099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Reargument ordered, and case set down for Wednesday, Decembers, 1915. Attention of counsel is called lo the fact that the record does not contain the exhibits described therein. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
171 A.D. 922, 155 N.Y.S. 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-cody-nyappdiv-1915.