Conklin v. Burdick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Conklin v. Burdick

6 Ill. App. 153, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 42

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 2, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Conklin v. Burdick, 6 Ill. App. 153, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 42 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

6 Ill. App. 153 (Conklin v. Burdick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related