Conklin v. Burdick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Conklin v. Burdick

6 Ill. App. 153, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 42

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 2, 1880

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Ill. App. 153 (Conklin v. Burdick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conklin v. Burdick, 6 Ill. App. 153, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 42 (Ill. Ct. App. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There can be no question that several erroneous instructions were given to the jury on the the trial of this cause. We think, however, upon a careful examination of all the evidence in the record, substantial justice was done by the verdict of the jury, and that a different verdict could not, under the evidence, have been permitted to stand.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Ill. App. 153, 1880 Ill. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-burdick-illappct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack