Conklin v. Blank
This text of 249 A.D. 747 (Conklin v. Blank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to declare void and to cancel certain bonds and mortgages on the ground that they were usurious, order granting motion of defendant Dora Blank, as administratrix, to require plaintiffs to furnish a further bill of particulars affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the bill to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 747, 292 N.Y.S. 978, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-blank-nyappdiv-1936.