Conklin v. Blank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conklin v. Blank

249 A.D. 747, 292 N.Y.S. 978, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5851

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

In an action to declare void and to cancel certain bonds and mortgages on the ground that they were usurious, order granting motion of defendant Dora Blank, as administratrix, to require plaintiffs to furnish a further bill of particulars affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the bill to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to declare void and to cancel certain bonds and mortgages on the ground that they were usurious, order granting motion of defendant Dora Blank, as administratrix, to require plaintiffs to furnish a further bill of particulars affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; the bill to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.

Conklin v. Blank, 249 A.D. 747, 292 N.Y.S. 978, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 747 (Conklin v. Blank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.