Conklin v. Bishop
This text of 3 Duer 646 (Conklin v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action to recover possession of a horse which the ■defendant, .a constable, had seized under an execution against [647]*647one Brown, who held the possession when the levy was made. Cowan, the creditor in whose favor the execution was issued, now applied upon notice to the plaintiff to be made a party-defendant. Held, that the applicant, as asserting the title of Brown, had such an interest in the subject of the action, as entitled him to be made a defendant, under § 122 of the Code as amended. Ordered that complaint be amended by the insertion of Cowan’s name as defendant.
Approved on consultation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Duer 646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conklin-v-bishop-nysuperctnyc-1854.