Conklin v. Augusta Chronicle Publishing Co.

Supreme Court

Conklin v. Augusta Chronicle Publishing Co.

254 U.S. 608, 41 S. Ct. 12, 65 L. Ed. 435, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1124

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 18, 1920·No. No. 353·Published

Opinion

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co. 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. Benjamin Pierce, with whom Mr. William H. Barrett was on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Argued October 12, 1920. Decided October 18, 1920. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co. 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mary L. Greer Conklin pro se. Mr. Benjamin Pierce, with whom Mr. William H. Barrett was on the brief, for appellee.

Conklin v. Augusta Chronicle Publishing Co., 254 U.S. 608, 41 S. Ct. 12, 65 L. Ed. 435, 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1124 (1920).

Pincite

254 U.S. 608 (Conklin v. Augusta Chronicle Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related