Conkle v. City of Bellevue

159 N.E. 581, 117 Ohio St. 585, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 42, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 585, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 220
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1927·No. 19725·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county be and the same hereby is reversed. In the opinion of a majority of this Court, Section 12075 of the General Code provides a concurrent rem'edy under the facts and circumstances of this controversy. It is therefore ordered that said cause be remanded to the Court of Appeals of Sandusky county for further proceedings according to law.

(Marshall, CJ., Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conkle v. City of Bellevue, 159 N.E. 581, 117 Ohio St. 585, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 42, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 585, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 220 (Ohio 1927).

159 N.E. 581 (Conkle v. City of Bellevue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewellyn v. Village of South Zanesville
183 N.E. 306 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)
Novak v. Steele
11 Ohio Law. Abs. 699 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1931)