Conkey v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 698
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 27, 1957
DocketReap. Dec. 9023; Entry No. 19751
StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 698 (Conkey v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Conkey v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 698 (cusc 1957).

Opinion

Laweence, Judge:

This cause of action involves the question of the proper dutiable value of certain mica splittings covered by the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

[699]*699When the case was called for hearing, the parties entered into a stipulation of fact whereby it was agreed that export value was the proper basis of appraisement for the involved merchandise and that said value on the date of exportation was one rupee per pound, f. o. b. Calcutta.

Upon the agreed statement of fact, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value is one rupee per pound, f. o. b. Calcutta.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1402
19 U.S.C. § 1402(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 Cust. Ct. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conkey-v-united-states-cusc-1957.