Conkey v. Anderson Farms, Inc.

289 N.W.2d 541, 205 Neb. 708, 1980 Neb. LEXIS 775
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided March 11, 1980·No. 42686·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

White, J.

The landowners appeal from an order dismissing a petition to establish a boundary of their property on government survey lines, and from the decree quieting title by adverse possession in favor of defendant to lands, the bare legal title to which is held by plaintiffs.

The weight of the evidence establishes and the trial court held that long established fence lines existed between the plaintiffs’ and defendant’s prop *709 erty for far longer than the statutory period; that the land was occupied under claim of right for more than the statutory period; and that the claim of title was actual, open, and continuous. Winkle v. Mitera, 195 Neb. 821, 241 N. W. 2d 329 (1976).

Where a fence is constructed as a boundary line, although it is not the actual boundary line, and parties claim ownership of land up to the fence for the uninterrupted statutory period, parties gain title to such land by adverse possession. McCain v. Cook, 184 Neb. 147, 165 N. W. 2d 734 (1969).

We conclude on independent examination of the record that the trial court was correct and the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Boslaugh, J., participating on briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Conkey v. Anderson Farms, Inc., 289 N.W.2d 541, 205 Neb. 708, 1980 Neb. LEXIS 775 (Neb. 1980).

289 N.W.2d 541 (Conkey v. Anderson Farms, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hadley v. Ideus
374 N.W.2d 231 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Petsch v. Widger
335 N.W.2d 254 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1983)
Wiedeman v. JAMES E. SIMON CO., INC
307 N.W.2d 105 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1981)