Coniglio v. Coniglio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coniglio v. Coniglio

283 A.D.2d 538, 725 N.Y.S.2d 214, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5219

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Coniglio v. Coniglio. Read the opinion of the Court — 295 A.D.2d 509 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 21, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated October 6, 2000, as referred the defendant’s application for maintenance and an award of an attorney’s fee to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the portion of the order appealed from is not appealable as of right and leave to appeal has not been granted (see, Palma v Palma, 101 AD2d 812). Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lifson, J.), dated October 6, 2000, as referred the defendant’s application for maintenance and an award of an attorney’s fee to the Family Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as the portion of the order appealed from is not appealable as of right and leave to appeal has not been granted (see, Palma v Palma, 101 AD2d 812). Friedmann, J. P., Goldstein, Feuerstein and Crane, JJ., concur.

Coniglio v. Coniglio, 283 A.D.2d 538, 725 N.Y.S.2d 214, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

283 A.D.2d 538 (Coniglio v. Coniglio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related