Conidaris Construction Co. v. First Atlantic Savings

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conidaris Construction Co. v. First Atlantic Savings

572 So. 2d 27, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9896, 1990 WL 212840

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 28, 1990

DocketNo. 90-00385

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 So. 2d 27 (Conidaris Construction Co. v. First Atlantic Savings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conidaris Construction Co. v. First Atlantic Savings, 572 So. 2d 27, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9896, 1990 WL 212840 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order dismissing with prejudice appellants’ complaint seeking to bar the enforcement of a foreign judgment which had been entered against plaintiffs. We agree with GNLV Corp. v. Featherstone, 504 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), that section 55.501, Florida Statutes (1988), which provides procedures for the domestication of foreign judgments in Florida, is constitutional. We do not agree with the argument of appellants that the provisions in that section for notice to the judgment debtor are insufficient to meet due process standards. We find no merit in appellants’ additional arguments.

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order dismissing with prejudice appellants’ complaint seeking to bar the enforcement of a foreign judgment which had been entered against plaintiffs. We agree with GNLV Corp. v. Featherstone, 504 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), that section 55.501, Florida Statutes (1988), which provides procedures for the domestication of foreign judgments in Florida, is constitutional. We do not agree with the argument of appellants that the provisions in that section for notice to the judgment debtor are insufficient to meet due process standards. We find no merit in appellants’ additional arguments.

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 27, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9896, 1990 WL 212840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conidaris-construction-co-v-first-atlantic-savings-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack