Coniber v. Center Point Transfer Station, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Coniber v. Center Point Transfer Station, Inc.

82 A.D.3d 1629, 919 N.Y.2d 409

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 25, 2011·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that it was premature to grant defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint at this stage of the litigation, in view of the limited discovery that has been conducted (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Sportiello v City of New York, 6 AD3d 421 [2004]). We further conclude, however, that the court should have denied the cross motion without prejudice (see Hall v Rite Aid Corp., 37 AD3d 1160 [2007]). We therefore modify the order accordingly. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Garni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that it was premature to grant defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint at this stage of the litigation, in view of the limited discovery that has been conducted (see CPLR 3212 [f]; Sportiello v City of New York, 6 AD3d 421 [2004]). We further conclude, however, that the court should have denied the cross motion without prejudice (see Hall v Rite Aid Corp., 37 AD3d 1160 [2007]). We therefore modify the order accordingly. Present — Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Garni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Coniber v. Center Point Transfer Station, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 1629, 919 N.Y.2d 409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

82 A.D.3d 1629 (Coniber v. Center Point Transfer Station, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related