Congress v. Congress

284 A.D. 807, 132 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3536
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 7, 1954·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order dated June 3, 1954, denying her motion for a preference and to vacate an order dated August 31, 1953, which order denied a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules. Order dated June 3, 1954, reversed, without costs, motion to vacate the order dated August 31, 1953, granted, without costs, and motion for a preference pursuant to rule 9 of the Kings County Supreme Court Rules, granted, without costs. Appeal from order dated August 31, 1953, dismissed, without costs. The affidavit of the physician who treated plaintiff for her injuries, the surgeon’s report, and the bill of particulars indicate that a preference was warranted under the stated rule. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Congress v. Congress, 284 A.D. 807, 132 N.Y.S.2d 11, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

284 A.D. 807 (Congress v. Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Kenipp v. Rodrequiz
14 A.D.2d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Brooklyn Society of the New Church v. Delroy Realty Corp.
5 A.D.2d 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)