Congress Bank & Trust Co. v. Wills
This text of 8 Conn. Supp. 179 (Congress Bank & Trust Co. v. Wills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A review of the file shows that the defendant’s claim for a jury trial came almost five years after the suit was brought. This makes the conclusion rather compelling' that a great constitutional right is not really at stake. Rather the situation comes with the reasoning and the philosophy of Judge McEvoy’s recent memorandum. It is true that the in[180]*180stant motion comes belatedly but counsel’s explanation of this is at least appealing. The court feels that the defendant’s right to a jury trial was waived by him. For this reason, and -on the reasoning indicated, the motion to strike from the jury ■docket is granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Conn. Supp. 179, 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/congress-bank-trust-co-v-wills-connsuperct-1940.