Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun v. Ophir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun v. Ophir

8 A.D.3d 139, 778 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8525

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 17, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.3d 139 (Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun v. Ophir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun v. Ophir, 8 A.D.3d 139, 778 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered September 24, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on grounds of a defense based on documentary evidence, claims barred by the statute of frauds, and failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In seeking to recover an apartment occupied by plaintiffs employee, exploration of plaintiffs relationship with the building landlord and defendants is essential to resolution of this dispute. According every reasonable inference to plaintiffs allegations, the complaint is viable. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered September 24, 2003, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on grounds of a defense based on documentary evidence, claims barred by the statute of frauds, and failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In seeking to recover an apartment occupied by plaintiffs employee, exploration of plaintiffs relationship with the building landlord and defendants is essential to resolution of this dispute. According every reasonable inference to plaintiffs allegations, the complaint is viable. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 139, 778 N.Y.S.2d 276, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/congregation-kehilath-jeshurun-v-ophir-nyappdiv-2004.