Conger v. Szeman, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conger v. Szeman, Inc.

549 So. 2d 228, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1989 WL 110930

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 26, 1989

DocketNo. 88-2080

StatusPublished

This text of 549 So. 2d 228 (Conger v. Szeman, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conger v. Szeman, Inc., 549 So. 2d 228, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1989 WL 110930 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The record clearly reveals that the appellant/defendant’s affidavit raised genuine issues of material fact relating to the appellant’s affirmative defenses of mutual mistake and waiver. The inability and failure to resolve the affirmative defenses should have precluded the trial court from entering the summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff/appellee. Broz v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 512 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Monroe County v. New Port Largo, Inc., 441 So.2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Headley, 419 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Also, and in consideration of the foregoing, it appears that the trial court’s striking of the appellant/defendant’s demand for jury trial was premature.

Accordingly, the Final Summary Judgment entered herein is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The record clearly reveals that the appellant/defendant’s affidavit raised genuine issues of material fact relating to the appellant’s affirmative defenses of mutual mistake and waiver. The inability and failure to resolve the affirmative defenses should have precluded the trial court from entering the summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff/appellee. Broz v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 512 So.2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Monroe County v. New Port Largo, Inc., 441 So.2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Johnson v. Headley, 419 So.2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

Also, and in consideration of the foregoing, it appears that the trial court’s striking of the appellant/defendant’s demand for jury trial was premature.

Accordingly, the Final Summary Judgment entered herein is reversed, and this cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded.

FERGUSON and LEVY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

549 So. 2d 228, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2258, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5289, 1989 WL 110930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conger-v-szeman-inc-fladistctapp-1989.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack