Conger v. . Conger
82 N.Y. 603, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 410
Opinion
reads for reversal of order of General Term, and for affirmance of judgment of Special Term.
All concur; Folger, Oh. J., concurring in result.
Order reversed and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conger v. . Conger, 82 N.Y. 603, 1880 N.Y. LEXIS 410 (N.Y. 1880).
82 N.Y. 603 (Conger v. . Conger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Adkins v. Adkins
190 A. 740 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1937)
People ex rel. Sheldon v. Curtin
27 N.Y. Crim. 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Roth v. Roth
90 A.D. 87 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Poillon v. Poillon
79 N.Y.S. 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Beadleston v. Beadleston
2 N.Y.S. 809 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)