Conger v. Callahan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Conger v. Callahan

240 A.D. 904

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 904 (Conger v. Callahan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conger v. Callahan, 240 A.D. 904 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss amended complaint as to defendants Daniel F. Callahan and Hurlbert McAndrew, as executors of Timothy Callahan, deceased, granted, with ten dollars costs. They were neither necessary nor proper parties defendant as executors of Timothy Callahan, deceased, under the facts set out in the complaint. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Rapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Westchester county reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss amended complaint as to defendants Daniel F. Callahan and Hurlbert McAndrew, as executors of Timothy Callahan, deceased, granted, with ten dollars costs. They were neither necessary nor proper parties defendant as executors of Timothy Callahan, deceased, under the facts set out in the complaint. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Rapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conger-v-callahan-nyappdiv-1933.