Congdon v. Westcott Express Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Congdon v. Westcott Express Co.

72 N.Y.S. 1098

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.Y.S. 1098 (Congdon v. Westcott Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Congdon v. Westcott Express Co., 72 N.Y.S. 1098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs to abide event, upon the authority of Osterhout v. Rabe, 39 App. Div. 413, 57 N. Y. Supp. 336. Plaintiff to have the right to exercise the option specified in the order appealed from. Form of order to be settled by and before Mr. Justice SPRING, upon two days’ notice. All concur, except McLBNNAN and HISCOCK, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs to abide event, upon the authority of Osterhout v. Rabe, 39 App. Div. 413, 57 N. Y. Supp. 336. Plaintiff to have the right to exercise the option specified in the order appealed from. Form of order to be settled by and before Mr. Justice SPRING, upon two days’ notice. All concur, except McLBNNAN and HISCOCK, JJ., who dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 N.Y.S. 1098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/congdon-v-westcott-express-co-nyappdiv-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack