Conforti v. Central School District No. 3 of Lloyd, Marlboro, New Paltz & Esopus
This text of 284 A.D. 1084 (Conforti v. Central School District No. 3 of Lloyd, Marlboro, New Paltz & Esopus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, made at a Trial Term for Ulster County, which granted a motion made by the defendants-respondents for a physical examination of the infant plaintiff. Appellants urge that defendants-respondents failed to present satisfactory evidence to' justify a second physical examination under section 306 of the Civil Practice Act. The infant plaintiff had voluntarily submitted to one examination. We think the moving papers set forth sufficient reasons for a second examination, and moreover the statute expresses no limitation on the number of examinations permitted. The right to permit a second examination has been recognized (Orlando v. Syracuse B. T. By. Go., 109 App. Div. 356; Leas v. New York é Albany Lighterage Co., 119 Mise. 323). Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Foster, P. J., Bergan, Coon, Halpern and Zeller, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 1084, 136 N.Y.S.2d 12, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conforti-v-central-school-district-no-3-of-lloyd-marlboro-new-paltz-nyappdiv-1954.