Confederation Life Association v. Vega
This text of 211 So. 2d 169 (Confederation Life Association v. Vega) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CONFEDERATION LIFE ASSOCIATION, a Canadian Corporation, Also Known As La Confederacion Del Canada, Petitioner,
v.
Manuel Antonio VEGA y Arminan, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Shutts & Bowen, Cotton Howell, Miami, Covington & Burling, John G. Laylin, William A. Dobrovir, and George V. Allen, Jr., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf, Thomas B. DeWolf and Michael G. Martin, Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The District Court of Appeal, Third District, having certified to us that its decision in the case of Confederation Life Association v. Vega y Arminan, 207 So.2d 33, passes upon a question of great public interest, we have jurisdiction of the petition for certiorari herein pursuant to Section 4(2), Article V, State Constitution, F.S.A.
Our study of the case leads us to the conclusion that the decision of the District Court is correct and we adopt it as our answer to the certified question.
The writ of certiorari is discharged.
ROBERTS, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur.
CALDWELL, C.J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 So. 2d 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/confederation-life-association-v-vega-fla-1968.