Coney v. State

88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 112, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 152
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 18, 1916
Docket7295
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 88 S.E. 918 (Coney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coney v. State, 88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 112, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 152 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Russell, C. J.

In the trial of criminal cases, where the guilt of the accused is wholly dependent upon circumstantial evidence, it is the duty of the trial judge, without any request, to instruct the jury to the effect that if the hypothesis of the defendant’s innocence is as reasonable as that of his guilt, the defendant should be acquitted. Riley v. State, 1 Ga. App. 651 (57 S. E. 1031); Weaver v. State, 135 Ga. 317 (69 S. E. 488). The failure so to instruct the jury in this case requires the grant of a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dyer v. State
29 S.E.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Daniel v. State
1 S.E.2d 229 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 918, 18 Ga. App. 112, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-state-gactapp-1916.