Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Coney v. State

Coney v. State

251 So. 3d 324
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 2018
DocketNo. 3D17-2282
StatusPublished

This text of 251 So. 3d 324 (Coney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coney v. State, 251 So. 3d 324 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*325Affirmed. See Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla. 1992) (noting: "It is well settled that the specific legal ground upon which a claim is based must be raised at trial and a claim different than that raised below will not be heard on appeal"); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332, 338 (Fla. 1982) (holding: "In order for an argument to be cognizable on appeal, it must be the specific contention asserted as legal ground for the objection, exception, or motion below"); Black v. State, 367 So.2d 656, 657 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (same). See also Overton v. State, 801 So.2d 877, 900-01) (Fla. 2001) (discussing evidentiary principle of "opening the door", premised on notions of fairness and truth-seeking function of a trial).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steinhorst v. State
412 So. 2d 332 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Black v. State
367 So. 2d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Rodriguez v. State
609 So. 2d 493 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)
Overton v. State
801 So. 2d 877 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 So. 3d 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.