Coney v. State
560 So. 2d 429, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3197, 1990 WL 59218
Opinion
The defendant appeals his departure sentence on the basis that no departure beyond the one-cell bump up is permitted under the guidelines. See Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565 (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989); Hamilton v. State, 548 So.2d 234 (Fla.1989); Dewberry v. State, 546 So.2d 409 (Fla.1989); Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Maddox v. State, 553 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). We agree. The defendant’s departure sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range.
SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coney v. State, 560 So. 2d 429, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3197, 1990 WL 59218 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
560 So. 2d 429 (Coney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pringal v. State
564 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Moran v. State
562 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)