Coney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Coney v. State

519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 633, 1988 WL 10216

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 16, 1988

DocketNo. 87-1876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 519 So. 2d 1144 (Coney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coney v. State, 519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 633, 1988 WL 10216 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s confession of error and our independent review of the record, we reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion to allow credit for jail time and prison time with directions to the trial court to determine the credit for time served that defendant is entitled to pursuant to State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976) and State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978).

As the state concedes, Coney is entitled to credit for time served on his original split sentence in Case No. 81-7055. The record is unclear, however, as to whether Coney is entitled to any credit for time served for convictions emanating from lower court Case Nos. 85-33106, 85-389, and 85-008. Consequently, on remand, we direct that counsel in the trial court consider Coney’s claim that he may have spent time in confinement while awaiting trial on the probation violation.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the state’s confession of error and our independent review of the record, we reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion to allow credit for jail time and prison time with directions to the trial court to determine the credit for time served that defendant is entitled to pursuant to State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla. 1976) and State v. Holmes, 360 So.2d 380 (Fla.1978).

As the state concedes, Coney is entitled to credit for time served on his original split sentence in Case No. 81-7055. The record is unclear, however, as to whether Coney is entitled to any credit for time served for convictions emanating from lower court Case Nos. 85-33106, 85-389, and 85-008. Consequently, on remand, we direct that counsel in the trial court consider Coney’s claim that he may have spent time in confinement while awaiting trial on the probation violation.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 So. 2d 1144, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 467, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 633, 1988 WL 10216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack