Coney v. State
This text of 417 So. 2d 777 (Coney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the defendant’s conviction for resisting an officer in the lawful exercise of [778]*778his legal duty upon a holding that under Section 843.01, Florida Statutes (1981), a • person may be convicted by showing an offer to do violence, see Scullock v. State, 377 So.2d 682 (Fla.1979), and the defendant’s acquittal on a separate count of aggravated battery upon the officer is not legally inconsistent with such a conviction. Courson v. State, 414 So.2d 207 (Fla.3d DCA 1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
417 So. 2d 777, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.