Coney v. Lozo

D. Nevada

Coney v. Lozo

DecidedMarch 26, 2024

Docket2:23-cv-01645

StatusUnknown

This text of Coney v. Lozo (Coney v. Lozo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coney v. Lozo, (D. Nev. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4|| William Coney, Case No. 2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Extending Deadlines V. 7|| Officer Michael Lozo, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 After screening plaintiff William Coney’s complaint and application to proceed in forma 1]|| pauperis, Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah issued an order and report and recommendation. 12|| ECF No. 9. Any objections to her findings were due by March 11, 2024. Id. Five days before this 13] deadline, the R@R served on Coney was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as “undeliverable — 14] unable to forward.” ECF No. 1L It is unclear whether Coney ever received the RGR. 15 The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to distribute a copy of Judge Youchah’s order 16|| (ECF No. 9) pursuant to the NEF so that the law librarian may serve it upon Coney. 17|| Accordingly, the deadline for Coney to file any objections is extended to April 9, 2024. Failure 18]| to file an objection will result in me adopting the R@R without a de novo review. Schmidt v. 19]| Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o review is required of a magistrate 20]| judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”). 21 Alternatively, Coney may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in 22|| the magistrate judge’s order. If Coney chooses to file an amended complaint, he must do so no later than April 19, 2024. / ) 24 Dated: March 26, 2024 Lf 25 Ko Ung States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4|| William Coney, Case No. 2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Extending Deadlines V. 7|| Officer Michael Lozo, et al., 8 Defendants 9 10 After screening plaintiff William Coney’s complaint and application to proceed in forma 1]|| pauperis, Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah issued an order and report and recommendation. 12|| ECF No. 9. Any objections to her findings were due by March 11, 2024. Id. Five days before this 13] deadline, the R@R served on Coney was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as “undeliverable — 14] unable to forward.” ECF No. 1L It is unclear whether Coney ever received the RGR. 15 The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to distribute a copy of Judge Youchah’s order 16|| (ECF No. 9) pursuant to the NEF so that the law librarian may serve it upon Coney. 17|| Accordingly, the deadline for Coney to file any objections is extended to April 9, 2024. Failure 18]| to file an objection will result in me adopting the R@R without a de novo review. Schmidt v. 19]| Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o review is required of a magistrate 20]| judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”). 21 Alternatively, Coney may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in 22|| the magistrate judge’s order. If Coney chooses to file an amended complaint, he must do so no later than April 19, 2024. / ) 24 Dated: March 26, 2024 Lf 25 Ko Ung States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Coney v. Lozo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-lozo-nvd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack