Coney v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

426 So. 2d 62, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27759
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 27, 1983
DocketNo. AL-215
StatusPublished

This text of 426 So. 2d 62 (Coney v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coney v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 426 So. 2d 62, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in Coney’s appeal from Commission action. Britt v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Lambeth v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 411 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). On Coney’s appeal the order is therefore AFFIRMED. But because the Commission fixed Coney’s offense severity as for a third degree felony, when in fact his offense was a second degree felony, the matter is REMANDED to the Commission to correct that error.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and LARRY G. SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Britt v. FLORIDA PAROLE & PROBATION COM'N
417 So. 2d 1079 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Lambeth v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
411 So. 2d 956 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
426 So. 2d 62, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coney-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1983.