Coneff v. Coneff

970 So. 2d 862, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18569, 2007 WL 4125440
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2007·No. Nos. 4D06-4741, 4D07-890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, in all respects, but remand for correction of an apparent scrivener’s error in calculating the elective share. The sum used in calculating one-half of the $885,000 sales price of the home was $447,500, where the correct amount is $442,500.

STONE, MAY, JJ., and TUTER, JACK BEN, JR., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coneff v. Coneff, 970 So. 2d 862, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18569, 2007 WL 4125440 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

970 So. 2d 862 (Coneff v. Coneff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gunn v. State
970 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)