Cone v. Wall

139 S.E. 2, 164 Ga. 550, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 222
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1927
DocketNo. 5656
StatusPublished

This text of 139 S.E. 2 (Cone v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cone v. Wall, 139 S.E. 2, 164 Ga. 550, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 222 (Ga. 1927).

Opinion

Hill, J.

There is no substantial error in the charge of the court complained of. The verdict is supported by the evidence, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Appeal and Error, 4 O. J. p. 852, n. 56; p. 1130, n. 63.

Ejectment, 19 C. J. p. 1178, n. 30.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. G. Murphy and George B. Rush, for plaintiff in error. P. K. Burns and J. J. Barge, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 S.E. 2, 164 Ga. 550, 1927 Ga. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cone-v-wall-ga-1927.