Cone v. Tracy

1 Root 479
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Tbe defendant bas got a deed of tbe plaintiff’s farm; tbe contract is executed on one part, wbicb takes it out of tbe statute made to prevent frauds and perjuries — tbe case is not witbin either tbe letter or tbe reason of tbe statute. Tbe evidence was admitted. Tbe case of Brown and wife v. Clark is in point, determined at tbe adjourned Superior Court, Hartford December A. D. 1777.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cone v. Tracy, 1 Root 479 (Colo. 1792).

1 Root 479 (Cone v. Tracy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Woodruff
23 Conn. 56 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1854)
Belden v. Seymour
8 Conn. 304 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1831)
Crocker v. Higgins
7 Conn. 342 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1829)
Griswold v. Messenger
23 Mass. 517 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1828)
Sparrow v. Smith
5 Conn. 113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1823)